本站大部份資料在 2016 年後就未更新，若資料內無明確標示資料時間，請預設該資料為過時資料並斟酌使用，謝謝
| column | value |
|---|---|
| Title | 環評審查結論遭法院撤銷案件之國賠可能性探討 |
| Abstract | 本報告以環評案件遭法院判決撤銷之案例為中心，先分析各種環評結論被撤銷之違法樣態。其次，整理與環評審查結論具有相同性質之其他否准申請處分、授益行政處分處分遭法院判決撤銷之案例，分析損失補償與國家賠償制度要件之差異性，並以環評案件為對象設想可能爭議狀態，各該狀態在與賠償及補償適用關係上，並予以類性化整理。再者，以中科三期案及美麗灣渡假村開發案兩焦點案例，環評審查結論撤銷分別適用損失補償以及國家賠償制度之可能問題，包括︰請求權主體、要件該當性、判斷標準、賠償範圍等問題。最後，歸納前述對於案例整理之違法樣態分析、環評案件爭議適用於賠償與補償制度之類型，提出環評審查程序或環評審查結論內容形成，於程序面或實質面，應有作法之建議，以避免環評審查結論遭法院撤銷所面臨損失補償或損害賠償之問題。 |
| EngTitle | A Study of State Compensation for EIA |
| EngAbstract | The purpose of this study is to examine the environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports invalidated by court and provide suggestions for Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) on avoiding the compensation issues of illegal EIA reports. First, the patterns of illegal EIA’s evaluation cases invalidated by court were analyzed. Second, the differences between damage compensation and state compensation were summarized. Among the reports, the Central Taiwan Science Park Phase III and the Miramar Development Project were further discussed on whether the EPA might be responsible for the damage compensation or state compensation. Finally, suggestions on how EPA may be able to avoid compensation in the future in terms of the illegal EIA’s evaluation cases. |
| ProjectYear | 103 |
| SponsorOrg | 綜計處 |
| ExecutingOrg | 國立臺北科技大學 |
| PublicFullVersionURL | http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/FileDownload.aspx?fid=69078 |