1. opendata.epa.gov.tw
  2. 環保專案摘要資料
  3. 32121794
column value
Title 101年度環境影響評估技術顧問機構業者評鑑及環保機關環境影響評估業務檢討會專案工作計畫
Abstract 環保署為瞭解環境影響評估技術顧問機構之執行現況與素質，自86年起開始辦理「環境影響評估技術顧問機構業者評鑑」工作，並將評鑑結果公告於環保署網站，供各界及開發單位選擇環境影響評估者時參考。環評相關顧問公司對於此項評鑑結果亦極為重視，因而積極提升本身素質、設備及人力。本計畫以協助建立環境影響評估業者評鑑相關資料、評鑑制度及辦法，並由專家學者組成評鑑小組共同評估業者之技術能力與服務品質，使環境影響評估技術顧問機構業者評鑑之工作得以更趨嚴謹與周全。本年度評鑑內容包括「基本資料審查」、「評鑑委員審查」、「主管機關審查」及「環評委員調查」等4部分，並納入「環評書件缺失」扣分項目。本年度合計37家技術顧問機構業者報名參與評鑑，由評鑑結果區分出A級7家、準A級3家、B級16家、C級10家及D級1家。另本年度應參與而未參與評鑑之業者合計27家，則將其列為N級。本報告亦針對評鑑執行過程發現之缺失提出建議，供未來執行相關計畫時參考。
EngTitle Evaluation of Technical Consulting Firms on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Impact
EngAbstract The Environment Protection Administration (EPA) in Taiwan has initiated “The Evaluation of Technical Consulting Firms on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)” since 1997. The evaluation takes place every two years, and the result is announced on the website of EPA once the evaluation is completed. The developers can refer to the result of evaluation to choose the appropriate technical consulting firms to work with. As a result, the technical consulting firms in Taiwan always try their best to improve their quality on EIA, so that they can receive a good result of evaluation. Based on this influence, the EPA has been trying to build up a good model of evaluation, and make the evaluation objective and impartial. The process of this year’s evaluation of technical consulting firms on EIA includes 4 parts, which are “basic information of the technical consulting firms”, “Quality of Reports Reviewed by the Evaluation Committee of EPA”, “Quality of Reports Reviewed by the EIA Evaluation Committee”, and “Quality of Reports Reviewed by the Environment Protection Administration (EPA) or the Environment Protection Bureau (EPB)”. This evaluation also includes “Neglect of Reports” if there is any falsification in the final report of EIA of the technical consulting firm. There are 37 technical consulting firms that signed up this year’s evaluation. 7 of the 37 technical consulting firms are A-grade, 3 of them are A-to-be, 16 of them are B-grade, 10 of them are C-grade, and 1 of them received D-grade. On the other hand, there are another 27 technical consulting firms that should participate in this year’s evaluation but reject to be evaluated are N-grade. In order to make the evaluation more and more authentic, which may promote the participation of evaluation, we also arranged the experiences of project implementation and oral reports of technical consulting firms for future improvement.
ProjectYear 101
SponsorOrg 綜計處
ExecutingOrg 社團法人台灣環境管理協會
PublicFullVersionURL http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/FileDownload.aspx?fid=43723