1. opendata.epa.gov.tw
  2. 環保專案摘要資料
  3. 32122241
column value
Title 應回收廢棄物稽核認證團體（廢輪胎類及廢鉛蓄電池類）專案工作計畫
Abstract 1.稽核認證回收量及處理量之執行成果，統計自96年4月1日至97年3月31日為止：一般廢輪胎稽核認證量計109,756,859公斤，廢輪胎特種胎稽核認證量計2,255條；一般廢鉛蓄電池稽核認證量計36,663,668公斤，特用電池稽核認證量計2,454,605公斤，本計畫共執行處理業2,000場次之稽核證作業。2.在稽核認證量不合格情形查核部分，廢輪胎類共扣量1,835,815公斤，合計 補貼費5,874,608元；廢鉛蓄電池類無稽核認證量不合格情形。3.人員訓練之實施成果：已完成每位新進人員40小時之職前訓練及專業考核，亦分別於96年6月22~24日及12月8日共4天完成專業集訓，並於96年8月22日、96年8月28日及96年9月4日辦理現場實地稽核訓練，另藉由每月召開工作會議來辦理定期會議訓練，以培訓現場稽核人員各類之專業技能及溝通技巧。4.處理業作業程序查核結果中，不合格比率以處理業之貯存情形異常為最高，占整體不合格次數之74.61%，分析其原因為多數處理業進料處理時經常廢輪胎搬移及進出廠車次頻繁，致使查核時不符合設施標準規範之頻率較高所致。5.環境稽核查核結果，以廠區環境不合格比例為最高，占整體不合格次數之50.00%。6.異常原因統計成果：廢輪胎處理業之重大異常部分以稽核認證設備異常發生次數最高（如進料電子磅秤及地磅故障/更換印表紙、進廠地磅故障、CCTV監視錄影系統故障及角度調整等異常，共計發生266次），占本計畫總重大異常次數的64.72%。非重大異常部分則以機械設備異常最高，共發生328次，占本計畫總非重大異常次數的78.10%，主要係因廢輪胎處理破碎使機械設備磨損較大，經常需要更換刀具以利處理作業的進行，故較易有設備故障、維修及保養的情形發生。廢鉛蓄電池處理廠所發生之重大異常中均為稽核認證設備異常，非重大異常中則為機械設備異常。7.會計稽核之執行，乃委託專業之勤業眾信會計所人員執行處理業之成品、半成品及原料庫存盤點，並檢視處理業提供之相關憑證，來執行檢視及勾稽其合理性。依據會計師查核結果，顯示查核處理業中其提供之憑證皆屬合理，並未發現任何重大異常情事。另依本計畫契約書規範，針對僅經營應回收廢棄物之處理業，進行財務、營運及繼續經營之假設等進行分析，亦無有發現重大異常事件。8.新設資源處理機構審核部分，本會共配合1家1場次處理機構申請受補貼機構資格及新增/變更審核之現勘作業。9.處理業違規記點成果共計39點，分析記點原因，主要為廢輪胎計量設備故障，即時列印卡紙所致。
EngTitle The Auditing and Certification Group of Regulated Recyclable Waste ( Waste Tires and Waste Lead Acid Batteries )
EngAbstract 1.According to the auditing and certification results from Apr. 2007 to Mar. 2008, the certified recycled quantity of waste tires was 109,756,859 kg. The certified recycled quantity of waste tires（special types）was 2,255 pieces. The certified recycled quantity of waste lead acid batteries（general types）was 36,663,668 kg. The certified recycled quantity of waste lead acid batteries（special types）was 2,454,605 kg. Total 2,000 field inspections for recycling industry were accomplished during the project period.2.For the auditing disqualified parts, total 1,835,815 kg certified recycled quantity of waste tire was deducted, which is equal to 5,874,608 NT dollars subsidy. There was no auditing disqualified event for waste lead acid batteries.3.For the faculty training part, every new employee received 40 hours training and testing. The professional training was conducted during 22~24 June 2007, 8 December 2007 and 4 field inspection trainings were conducted on 22 August 2007, 28 August 2007 and 04 September 2007. In order to enhance the professional knowledge and the communication skill of inspectors, the routine meeting and training were held monthly.4.For the auditing results of operation process, the major disqualified events were abnormal storage conditions which contribute 74.61% of the total. The causes for the disqualifications were the waste tires displace and the high frequency of entering and exiting trucks.5.For the auditing results of environmental safety, the major disqualified events were the inappropriate environmental maintenance of factories which contribute 50.00% of the total.6.The statistics for the causes of abnormal events in waste tires recycling facilities: Malfunctions of auditing and certification equipments were the main causes of major abnormal events, which contribute 64.72% of the total major abnormal events. Malfunctions of the processing equipments were the main causes of minor abnormal events, which contribute 78.10% of the total minor abnormal events. The frequent blade replacements for the tire cracker were the main reason for the equipment malfunctions.The statistics for the causes of abnormal events in waste lead acid batteries recycling facilities:Malfunctions of auditing and certification equipments were the causes of major abnormal events. Malfunctions of the processing equipments were the causes of minor abnormal events.7.Accounting auditing was carried out by the professional accountants-Deloitte & Touche twice a year. The auditing contents include the inventory of products, semi-products, raw materials and their relative stock records. According to the results of accounting auditing, there was no major abnormal event found. As the same, there was no major abnormal event found during the financial and operation analysis referring to the project contract. 8.During the project period, FTIS helped to evaluate the field inspections of the subsidized qualification for a recycling firm.9.The violation scoring for those recycling facilities were 39 points. The main causes for the violation scoring were the printing paper stuck of the quantity measuring equipment for waste tires.
ProjectYear 096
SponsorOrg 基管會
ExecutingOrg 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會
PublicFullVersionURL http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/FileDownload.aspx?fid=874